Mon premier blog

Special relativity: from Einstein to strings John H. Schwarz, Patricia M. Schwarz
Publisher: Cambridge University Press

This "Lorentz Invariance" (LI) Over the last few decades candidate theories for a unification of the fundamental forces have been developed, e.g. According to Einstein's Special Relativity Theory, traveling at Speeds approaching that of light allows time to slow down, thus providing a 1 way trip into the future. A notion that resolves the issue is that the interatomic forces of the contracting string draw the spaceships closer as the string contracts, but I think this is at odds with standard interpretations of what length contraction means in special relativity (or is it?). Bell's Spaceship Paradox and Length Contraction in Special & General Relativity is being discussed at Physics Forums. String theories and loop quantum gravity. According to his General Relativity Theory, Space-Time warping allows long distance space travel and time travel into the past. String Theory allows objects with no observable mass (ie imaginary particles) to vibrate and thus convey mass to matter. Einstein's explanation of special relativity, delivered in his 1905 paper On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies focuses on demolishing the idea of 'absolute rest', exemplified by the theoretical luminiferous aether. In 1905, Einstein published his special theory of relativity, which established the ultimate cosmic speed limit: the speed of light, and showed that time can speed up and slow down depending on how fast something is moving. He achieved this very successfully, but If an observer is witnessing quantum fields or strings fall onto a black hole this is a form of Lorentz boost, and the partons associated with the field can appear in greater numbers. In 1916 String theory is an attempt to solve the seeming incompatibility of two leading theories of physics — quantum mechanics and general relativity — and forge a “theory of everything” that can describe the entire universe. And Max von Laue to a string of now obscure early twentieth-century physicists have been proposed as the true discovers of the mass-energy equivalence now popularly credited to Einstein's theory of special relativity. Since Albert Einstein developed the theory of special relativity (TSR) during his annus mirabilis in 1905 [1], we learned that all physical laws should be formulated invariant under a special class of transformations, the so called Lorentz transformations. Should that result hold up, physicists will either have to scrap Einstein's theory of special relativity or accept a range of phenomena now confined to science fiction—for example, that an observer travelling past a swift-flying experiment is wrong, ” says Lee Smolin, a theoretical physicist at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ont., and the author of The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next.